The Global Omega-3 Crisis: Why Most People Aren't Getting Enough

New research confirms a worldwide omega-3 deficiency affecting brain, heart, and cellular health. Here's what the science shows and how to close the gap.

Wild-caught salmon fillet on dark slate with omega-3 rich foods surrounding it

Despite decades of research confirming omega-3 fatty acids as essential nutrients for brain function, cardiovascular health, and cellular integrity, a comprehensive analysis released this month reveals that most people worldwide simply aren’t getting enough. The gap between scientific recommendations and actual intake isn’t small; it’s vast enough to constitute a genuine public health crisis. Researchers are now emphasizing that EPA and DHA, the two most biologically active omega-3s, play critical roles across all life stages, from fetal brain development to cognitive preservation in aging. Yet the average person’s intake falls dramatically short of minimum therapeutic thresholds.

The problem isn’t lack of awareness. Omega-3 supplements represent one of the largest categories in the dietary supplement market. The problem is that many people either don’t supplement at all, take inadequate doses, or rely on plant-based omega-3s (ALA) that convert poorly to the forms their bodies actually need. Understanding why omega-3s matter, how much you actually need, and how to efficiently close the gap requires diving deeper than most wellness content goes.

Why Your Body Can’t Make What It Needs

Omega-3 fatty acids are classified as “essential” because humans cannot synthesize them from other nutrients. Your body can make saturated fat from carbohydrates, and it can interconvert some fatty acids, but the omega-3 pathway requires dietary input. Specifically, you need to consume either alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), found in flaxseed, chia, and walnuts, or preformed EPA and DHA, found primarily in fatty fish and algae.

The catch is that ALA, the plant form, converts to EPA at rates of only 5-10% in most people, and to DHA at rates of 2-5% or lower. Some genetic variants make conversion even less efficient. This means that relying on flaxseed oil or chia seeds for your omega-3 needs would require consuming impractically large amounts to achieve meaningful EPA and DHA levels. A tablespoon of flaxseed oil contains about 7 grams of ALA, but after conversion, you might net 350-700mg of EPA and only 140-350mg of DHA, assuming optimal conversion that most people don’t achieve.

Infographic showing omega-3 conversion rates from ALA to EPA and DHA
Plant-based ALA converts poorly to the EPA and DHA your body actually needs

EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) serve distinct but complementary roles. EPA is primarily anti-inflammatory, competing with arachidonic acid for the enzymes that produce inflammatory signaling molecules. Higher EPA levels are associated with reduced C-reactive protein, lower triglycerides, and decreased risk of cardiovascular events. DHA is structural, comprising a significant portion of brain cell membranes and retinal tissue. Adequate DHA is critical for cognitive function, visual acuity, and neurological health across the lifespan.

The Scope of the Deficiency

Research published this month confirms what smaller studies have suggested: the majority of the global population fails to meet even conservative omega-3 intake recommendations. The findings emphasize that the gap exists across all demographics, though it’s particularly pronounced in populations that don’t regularly consume fatty fish.

The American Heart Association recommends eating fatty fish at least twice per week, which provides roughly 500mg of combined EPA and DHA daily on average. For people with documented heart disease, the recommendation increases to 1,000mg daily. For triglyceride reduction, clinical doses of 2,000-4,000mg may be necessary. Yet surveys consistently show that most Americans eat fish less than once per week, with average EPA and DHA intake falling below 200mg daily, less than half the minimum recommendation.

The Omega-3 Index, a blood test measuring the percentage of EPA and DHA in red blood cell membranes, provides objective assessment of omega-3 status. An Omega-3 Index below 4% is associated with highest cardiovascular risk; 4-8% represents intermediate risk; above 8% is considered optimal and associated with lowest risk. Studies suggest that approximately 80% of Americans have an Omega-3 Index below 8%, and roughly 20% fall into the highest-risk category below 4%.

Omega-3 Index blood test results showing risk categories from deficient to optimal
Most people fall below the optimal 8% Omega-3 Index threshold

Health Consequences of Inadequate Omega-3 Intake

The cardiovascular effects of omega-3 deficiency are best documented. EPA and DHA reduce triglycerides by 15-30% at therapeutic doses, lower blood pressure modestly, reduce platelet aggregation, and improve arterial function. Multiple large trials, including REDUCE-IT, demonstrated that high-dose EPA significantly reduced cardiovascular events in patients with elevated triglycerides. The magnitude of benefit in REDUCE-IT, a 25% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, exceeded what statins typically achieve for secondary prevention.

Neurological effects are equally compelling but take longer to manifest. DHA comprises approximately 40% of the polyunsaturated fatty acids in the brain and 60% in the retina. During pregnancy and early childhood, adequate DHA is critical for brain development; deficiency is associated with cognitive delays and visual impairment. In adults, higher omega-3 status correlates with preserved brain volume, better cognitive performance, and reduced risk of dementia. Recent research found that more muscle mass and adequate omega-3 status were linked to younger biological brain age, while deficiencies accelerated brain aging markers.

Inflammation underlies many chronic diseases, and omega-3s, particularly EPA, directly modulate inflammatory pathways. They compete with omega-6 fatty acids (abundant in vegetable oils) for incorporation into cell membranes. When inflammation is triggered, cells with higher omega-3 content produce less inflammatory prostaglandins and leukotrienes. This matters for conditions ranging from rheumatoid arthritis to inflammatory bowel disease to depression, all of which show associations with omega-3 status.

Closing the Gap: Practical Strategies

The most efficient way to optimize omega-3 status is through direct EPA and DHA consumption, either from fatty fish or supplements. Relying on ALA conversion is mathematically unfavorable for most people.

Fatty fish remains the gold standard. A 4-ounce serving of wild salmon provides approximately 1,500-2,000mg of combined EPA and DHA. Sardines, mackerel, herring, and anchovies offer similar concentrations. Even canned versions retain most of their omega-3 content. Two to three servings weekly of fatty fish can bring most people to adequate intake levels without supplementation.

Mercury concerns are often overstated for fish consumption at recommended levels. The fish highest in omega-3s (salmon, sardines, anchovies, mackerel) are also among the lowest in mercury due to their position in the food chain. Larger predatory fish like shark, swordfish, and king mackerel should be limited, but these aren’t significant omega-3 sources anyway. For most adults, the cardiovascular and neurological benefits of fatty fish consumption substantially outweigh mercury risks.

Supplementation fills the gap efficiently. Fish oil supplements typically provide 300-500mg of combined EPA/DHA per 1,000mg capsule. Concentrated formulations offer 700-900mg per capsule. Algae-based omega-3 supplements provide a viable option for vegetarians and vegans, delivering DHA and sometimes EPA without fish. Krill oil offers a different phospholipid form that may have slightly better absorption, though it typically contains less EPA/DHA per serving.

Dosing should reflect your baseline status and health goals. For general health maintenance in people who eat some fish, 500-1,000mg of combined EPA/DHA daily is reasonable. For cardiovascular risk reduction, 1,000-2,000mg is more appropriate. For triglyceride reduction, clinical doses of 2,000-4,000mg (often prescription grade) may be necessary under physician guidance.

PopulationRecommended EPA+DHABest Sources
General adults500-1,000mg/day2-3 servings fatty fish/week or supplement
Heart disease risk1,000-2,000mg/dayDaily supplement + regular fish intake
High triglycerides2,000-4,000mg/dayPrescription omega-3 + dietary sources
Pregnancy/nursing300-600mg DHA/dayLow-mercury fish + prenatal DHA supplement
Vegetarian/vegan250-500mg DHA/dayAlgae-based DHA supplement

The Bottom Line

Omega-3 deficiency represents one of the most prevalent and easily correctable nutritional gaps in modern diets. The consequences span cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, chronic inflammation, and potentially accelerated aging. Yet closing the gap requires nothing more exotic than eating fatty fish regularly or taking an affordable supplement.

The research is unambiguous: most people need more EPA and DHA than they’re currently getting. Whether through wild salmon, sardines, or a quality fish oil supplement, addressing this deficiency offers one of the highest returns on investment in preventive health. Omega-3s work synergistically with other anti-inflammatory lifestyle strategies, and supporting your gut-brain axis can enhance absorption and maximize the cognitive benefits of adequate omega-3 intake.

Next Steps:

  1. Consider an Omega-3 Index blood test to establish your baseline status
  2. Aim for 2-3 servings of fatty fish weekly (salmon, sardines, mackerel)
  3. If fish intake is inconsistent, add a 1,000mg fish oil or algae supplement daily
  4. Choose supplements providing at least 500mg combined EPA/DHA per serving
  5. Store fish oil in the refrigerator to prevent oxidation and fishy aftertaste

Sources: December 2025 global omega-3 intake analysis, American Heart Association fish consumption guidelines, REDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes trial, Omega-3 Index research from Harris et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology omega-3 meta-analyses.

Written by

Dash Hartwell

Health Science Editor

Dash Hartwell has spent 25 years asking one question: what actually works? With dual science degrees (B.S. Computer Science, B.S. Computer Engineering), a law degree, and a quarter-century of hands-on fitness training, Dash brings an athlete's pragmatism and an engineer's skepticism to health journalism. Every claim gets traced to peer-reviewed research; every protocol gets tested before recommendation. When not dissecting the latest longevity study or metabolic health data, Dash is skiing, sailing, or walking the beach with two very energetic dogs. Evidence over marketing. Results over hype.